Big Ideas & Perspectives,News
Europe’s music sector must embrace open innovation to compete globally
By Bodil Malmström
Europe’s music sector can remain competitive only if open innovation becomes a shared responsibility. ekip’s policy recommendations highlight a clear path forward: strengthen capabilities that allow many small actors to collaborate, involve audiences as active partners, and support alternative ownership and business models through long-term, intelligent funding.
When these elements align, the sector benefits from faster learning cycles, fairer outcomes for creators, and a stronger pipeline of scalable ideas across borders.
Build technology, data and business skills across the ecosystem and strengthen creator organizations as open-innovation and bargaining hubs.
Most actors in the music sector are small and lack the resources to influence regulation or invest in advanced tools independently. Digital literacy, metadata management, rights knowledge and basic financial skills are essential for artists and SMEs to participate in pilots, adopt shared standards and improve data quality.
Strong unions, collectives and representative bodies help aggregate these fragmented voices, creating feedback loops between practice and policy, reducing duplication and accelerating problem-solving.
“The sector lacks the skills, the data, and the unified voice needed to take full advantage of digital and platform-based opportunities,”
says Ragnar Siil, Director at Creativity Lab (Estonia).
Without stronger skills and collective representation, creators remain dependent on intermediaries and excluded from innovation processes.
Empower audiences as active partners, not passive consumers.
When listeners understand how recommendation systems and payouts work, and can influence discovery mechanisms, they support fairer services and more diverse repertoires. Tools such as audience panels, transparency dashboards and privacy-safe feedback systems turn platforms into living labs.
This demand-driven innovation helps creators and SMEs design services that reflect real needs and build trust.
“Audiences can drive innovation in many ways – if we let them,”
says Lena Holmberg, Collaboration Office, Lund University.
Design funding models that reward cultural value, diversity and sustainability as drivers of innovation.
Current EU funding frameworks often separate innovation from cultural value. ekip argues for funding models that support cross-sector collaboration and experimentation through innovation portfolios rather than isolated startups.
“We need funding that supports both sustainable growth and continuous innovation,”
notes Charlotte Lorentz Hjorth, Coordinator of ekip.
Support cooperative, artist-led and public-interest platforms through predictable financing.
Alternative platform models keep value within local scenes and allow experimentation with governance, payouts and data practices. To scale these models, ekip proposes platform taxation targeting the largest services, with revenues reinvested into data infrastructure, digital literacy, living labs and diversity programmes.
Allowing platforms to invest directly in approved local projects ensures funds strengthen the ecosystem rather than extract value from it.
Find out more!
Link to the Policy Recommendation:
https://ekipengine.eu/policies/platformisation-of-the-music-industry/
April 16, 2026
By Bodil Malmström
The transition toward a circular and sustainable fashion industry is gaining momentum across Europe, driven by both environmental urgency and evolving policy frameworks. ...
April 15, 2026
By Bodil Malmström
From design studios to gaming startups, Europe’s cultural and creative industries are widely recognised as engines of growth. Yet behind the consensus lies a fragmented policy landscape that risks hol...
February 18, 2026
By Lena Holmberg
At ekip, Open Innovation is more than a principle—it is a strategic principal positioning cultural and creative industries at the forefront of Europe’s innovation cycle....
February 18, 2026
By Bodil Malmström
In Brussels and beyond, cultural policy is often accused of reacting too late to technological shocks or market shifts. ...